NTT's Question Answering System for NTCIR-6 QAC-4
نویسندگان
چکیده
NTCIR-6 QAC-4 organizers announced that there would be no restriction (such as factoid) on QAC4 questions, but they plan to include many ‘definition’ questions and ‘why’ questions. Therefore, we focused on these two question types. For ‘definition’ questions, we used a simple pattern-based approach. For ‘why’ questions, hand-crafted rules were used in previous work for answer candidate extraction [5]. However, such rules greatly depend on developers’ intuition and are costly to make. We adopt a supervised machine learning approach. We collected causal expressions from the EDR corpus and trained a causal expression classifier, integrating lexical, syntactic, and semantic features. The experimental results show that our system is effective for ‘why’ and ‘definition’ questions.
منابع مشابه
NTT's CCLQA System for NTCIR-7 ACLIA
This paper describes our Complex Cross-Lingual Question Answering (CCLQA) system based on the technologies used in our past NTCIR systems for QAC and CLQA. We implemented a new rule-based English question analyzer to extract English query terms, which are translated into Japanese by translation dictionaries. For DEFINITION, BIOGRAPHY, and EVENT questions, we reused our definition module for QAC...
متن کاملNTT's QA Systems for NTCIR QAC-1
In this paper, we describe two Question Answering systems that participated in the NTCIR QAC task. The first system, SAIQA-Ii, follows a standard worddistance approach. This system was designed to output the top five candidates and participated in TASK-1. The second system, SAIQA-Is, employs a logic-based approach. This system was designed to output only the most likely candidates and participa...
متن کاملQuestion Answering System Using Concept-Based Vector Space Model
This paper presents the architecture of the Concept-based Vector Space Model Question Answering System (CBVSM-QAS) developed at the Nagaoka University of Technology (NUT) and used in the 4-th NTCIR workshop Question Answering Challenge (QAC) evaluation. The CBVSM-QAS runs on the factual question, which is, correspond to the subtask-1 in the NTCIR-4’s QAC. One major peculiarity of this system is...
متن کاملAn Overview of the 4th Question Answering Challenge (QAC-4) at NTCIR Workshop 6
In QAC-4, we defined question answering task using any type of question, mainly focused on non-factoid questions. There are 8 participants and 14 runs from these participants. In the evaluation, four kinds of criterion were used for some portion of participants answer set. The evaluation results showed some of the participant systems could focus on the area which correct answer contents exist b...
متن کاملPOSTECH Question-Answering Experiments at NTCIR4-QAC
This paper describes our system and additional experimental results in NTCIR-4 QAC Task 1. The main components of our system are question classification, passage retrieval, and named entity extraction. Passage retrieval was performed by a density-based ranking method based on importance of query terms occurred in the passage. Question classification and Named entity extraction were designed by ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007